City council passed a motion on Monday to address the ongoing problem of finding a permanent home for Second Chance Recovery, one of two methadone clinics in Calgary.
The motion, put forth by Ald. Brian Pincott and Ald. Diane Colley-Urquhart, will review current zoning by-laws surrounding methadone clinics, which are currently classified as medical clinics. It will investigate the possibility of allowing the drug treatment facilities to be set up in light industrial areas.
The Second Chance Recovery was given notice earlier this year to move out of its northeast industrial location because it wasn't properly zoned. In early July, the clinic quietly reopened in a stripmall in the southwest community of Braeside. The move blindsided residents, Calgary police and Pincott, the ward's alderman.
A townhall meeting that drew hundreds of residents did little to educate or alleviate fears despite the best efforts of Pincott and Calgary police to illuminate and calm the raucous crowd. The operators of the clinic were a no-show, which only inflamed residents who felt slighted by the fact they weren't consulted beforehand (though many openly acknowledged prior notification would not have swayed their opinions).
In the parking lot outside the community hall, some class act littered vehicles with $10 coupons to Spy City.
The next day saw the clinic's operators announce they would shut down the clinic, leaving some 500 clients out in the cold. Days later it announced it would be working on finding a new location in Calgary.
"Everyone was a loser that night," said Colley-Urquhart at today's council meeting, while admitting the motion is a Band-Aid solution to a problem that needs to see the whole community, including Alberta's Health Services, get involved.
Here's a slightly edited version of Colley-Urquhart addressing council:
And here's Colley-Urquhart after the meeting:
Suzy Thompson on Canine questionnaire5
chachiherbert on Canine questionnaire5
Wanda Fuca on A heart for AGC3
dejaview on A heart for AGC3
All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012
About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use
Comments: 4
Agent666 wrote:
The point is that all the people crying "NIMBY!" don't really want this scum in THEIR neighborhoods, either. People have legitimate concerns about having an element with past/current links to narcotics trafficking frequenting their neighborhoods. While some addicts may truly be trying to get off the smack (after being dumb enough to spend thousands getting hooked on it, in the first place), many more are FORCED to undergo Methadone 'treatment' as a parole condition, and continue to buy the real stuff. Drug addicts are the lifeblood of all those nasty, gun-toting criminals (Fresh Off the Boat, FOB-Killers, &c.) and, by association, are a threat to any community they visit.
What's truly appalling is that residents were unaware of this clinic in their midst. Public notice must be given for a new gas station, or convenience store to be built, but apparently junkie Meccas can be kept a secret from residents and law enforcement.
on Jul 31st, 2009 at 2:39am Report Abuse
fang wrote:
Considering your track record of lying and/or making shit up, I have no idea if your comment about the residents being unawares is true or not. If true, I'm on your side - it's appalling.
However, I am against this particular NIMBYism.
I live in West Hillhurst. Bring the clinic on. I'll volunteer to help out. Seriously.
If you had valid concerns about how it was being run, or the lack of regulation - that might be different story. If you lived near one of the hospitals you mentioned and the clinic was going there, you'd probably be just as vocally against it. You don't really care where it is, as long as you can pretend it (and drug addicts) don't exist. Your obvious disregard for addicts as sub-humans is revolting.
Maybe your community should take an organized and vocal stand against the "nasty, gun-toting criminals", instead of against the clinic. It's very likely you could run a methadone clinic without all of the side effects that you're so quick to predict as a "certainty".
I hate to break it to you, but drug trafficking already exists in your community, the guns, the money, the crime. It's all there, it just might be behind the closed door of your neighbor instead of out in the street.
Your attitude disgusts me.
on Jul 31st, 2009 at 7:50am Report Abuse
Lindsey Wallis wrote:
They were forced out of their last location by NIMBY (technically it was because of zoning, but the community vocally opposed the clinic, maybe the zoning was just an excuse?) and were two days away from losing their home without having a new location.
As a medical facility they have no obligation to inform citizens of where they will go, so they were not breaking any rules.
on Jul 31st, 2009 at 10:54am Report Abuse
Agent666 wrote:
Also, most hospitals already have some sort of outpatient drug addiction clinic. The difference is that Second Chance Recovery is a PRIVATE entity. Again, why is this a 'good' thing, if private opthamology, or surgical clinics aren't?
As for the crime element...I find it hillarious that the proverbial latte-luggers and Birkenstock hippies go out of their way to buy 'fair trade' coffee, or whatever, but buy recreational drugs. Be it smack, crack, or pot, every penny of your drug purchases funds terrible people on many levels: the narco cartels that produce 'hard' drugs (and the Bikers and Asian gang associates that grow pot), as well as the street-level dealers who sell it. Boycott illegal drugs (INCLUDING pot) and you remove a major revenue stream from organized crime.
Instead of standing up for the 'rights' of stupid junkies to get a fix from fatcat Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals' opioid, how about sticking up for victims of crime? People who've been innocent victims of drug gang shootings, people who've had their homes burglarized, rape victims, &c. Idiotic drug addicts have only themselves to blame.
on Jul 31st, 2009 at 11:07am Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)