My one-year-old daughter and I spent last Monday morning alongside a lifeless, sinister stretch of pavement in northeast Calgary. This morning's destination—a trip to the zoo—was much more enjoyable, but getting to the zoo got my blood boiling.

The problem, see, is that I chose to ride my bike to the zoo instead of driving. We live close to the zoo — the ride's not far at all. Often my daughter and I ride past the zoo with the bike chariot on the Nose Creek Pathway when we're out for a ride. So why drive when we're so close?

The Nose Creek Pathway goes by the zoo — in fact, it kind of wraps around it. The path is a stone's throw away from the parking lot. So there must be access to the zoo's main entrance from the pathway, right? Some kind of connector pathway or road? A gravel path, even? I checked the city's pathway closure site before I left, and it seemed to indicate we were in the clear. Surely the path must connect somehow.

Wrong. It doesn't connect. You can get to the zoo on St. George's Drive, but that road is shut down for construction, which eliminates that option. What I had to do is pull up on the pathway right beside the zoo parking lot, and then cut across a gravel road that looks like it's part of a construction site, bumping the bike chariot over a few 2x4s and then squeezing us into the parking lot through an opening beside a closed gate — an opening we clearly weren't supposed to be using.

Any cyclist in Calgary who's serious about getting anywhere has little choice but to go where he's not supposed to go. We were going to the zoo, and I wasn't about to turn around and find some long alternate route because of the city's planning negligence.

But it did make me mad that I was dragging my one-year-old daughter through part of a construction site. It made me think that maybe I was being a bad parent — but more than that, it reminded me that nothing has changed in this city. A bunch of us cyclists have been bitching about the lack of bike infrastructure here for as long as I can remember, and nothing has changed — no matter what the suits at city hall say. The city likes to boast that it has "the most extensive bike pathway system in North America" (whatever that means), but the reality is city hall's priorities lie elsewhere — with roads, mostly. It's sad. The city's message to cyclists has been the same since I moved here almost ten years ago: fuck off. And get a car.

Need more proof? Just head north on the Nose Creek Pathway, where construction halts the pathway in the middle of nowhere. Actually, it's not in the middle of nowhere — it's mere metres from 32 Ave., a road that cyclists could use to work their way north, past the construction zone. But the way the city has set it up, it might as well be in the middle of nowhere. The pathway suddenly ends. And there's a sign with a long-ass detour that nobody in their right mind would actually use.

When the city shuts down roads for construction, there are workable detours, warnings well in advance and so on. With bike infrastructure it's a different story. The underlying assumption seems to be that nobody rides their bikes the way people drive cars — to get from place to place, running errands, going to work and what not. The city — despite all its empty talk about alternative transportation — seems to think that cars are for commuting and bikes are for recreation. For amusement.

Well, I ain't amused. And neither are a lot of other Calgarians who are making an effort to leave their cars at home. This is the one thing that's encouraging about all this: a lot of people in this city are getting fed up with Calgary's roads-roads-roads status quo, and are speaking up.

But will it change anything? Who knows. I certainly hope so. That was my hope before I had a kid, and now that I'm pulling my little girl behind me when I ride, it's that much more important. We need safe, practical cycling infrastructure. The city is working on some kind of comprehensive bike strategy thingy right now — but who knows if that will actually make a difference. The city's always working on some feel-good strategy like that while working against it in practice. Jawing about cycling ("a fun, healthy and an inexpensive way to get around," says the city's website) is all well and good, but the proof is in the pavement — and that's still lacking. I'll believe it when I see it.

(Cross posted at www.jeremyklaszus.com.)