A blog by Calgary freelance writer Jeremy Klaszus.

Future looks bleak for Plan It Calgary

Plan It Calgary, the city’s long-range planning blueprint, will almost certainly be in for a rough ride once it reaches city council in June. (See story here, and council members' comments here.)

Over the past couple weeks I’ve spoken with every council member about the Plan It draft (except Ald. Diane Colley-Urquhart — see past post). A couple aldermen indicated that they plan to vote against it (Ray Jones and Jim Stevenson). Others are clearly unhappy with the plan (Dale Hodges, Andre Chabot, Ric McIver and Linda-Fox-Mellway). I don’t know Colley-Urquhart’s thoughts, but she hasn’t exactly showered the plan with praise in other media.

There are only a handful of clear supporters of the plan (Druh Farrell, Joe Ceci and Brian Pincott).

Then there’s a quartet of aldermen in the mealy-mouthed middle — Gord Lowe, Bob Hawkesworth, Joe Connelly (who, to be fair, seems pretty unimpressed by the plan) and John Mar.

As for the mayor, he says the “foundational work” of the plan is “headed in the right direction.” But Bronco also says the plan isn’t “etched in stone” and that city council will “refine the plans if refinements are required.”

Let’s look at the numbers. Let’s be generous and say that Farrell, Ceci, Pincott, Hawkesworth, Mar and Bronco all vote to implement Plan It. That’s six votes, and there are 15 votes on council. The supporters could be easily outnumbered nine to six.

Or look at it this way. Stevenson, Jones, Hodges, Connelly, Chabot, McIver and Fox-Mellway will clearly need a lot of convincing if they’re going to vote in favour of the plan. (I’m guessing Colley-Urquhart falls into this group too, but let’s be conservative and assume she’s undecided.) That’s seven votes. They only need to sway one more council member to have the commanding eight votes they need to spike the plan. Of course, it’s likely that the plan won't be spiked, but significantly amended or sent back to administration or who knows what else after the June 16 public hearing.

In any case, the future doesn’t look very bright for Plan It.


more in News     |     posted Apr 30th, 2009 at 2:31pm     

Comments: 1

Subvertisement wrote:

Well honestly, in a city like Calgary where any kind of progressive idea that would be vintage elsewhere (like curbside recycling or green roofs for instance!!), people really like to keep their heads up their a$$es and continue to live in a completely unsustainable and unrealistic manner, until the very end of their ability to do so. And most of the proposed "densification" that PlanIt proposes doesn't lead to high density "high rise" developments as Colley-Urquhart seems to think, but to mixed developments that lead to medium density.

Most people have to remember that Calgary is not about communities, cultural development, and people at the end of the day, but cars, mini-malls, parking lots, and money. People have no idea about anything outside their ridiculous bubbles that have burst long ago now - and they would rather live in denial for as long as possible than face the truth and create a better future.

on May 8th, 2009 at 5:52pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use