A blog by Calgary freelance writer Jeremy Klaszus.
Plan It Calgary, the city’s long-range planning blueprint, will almost certainly be in for a rough ride once it reaches city council in June. (See story here, and council members' comments here.)
Over the past couple weeks I’ve spoken with every council member about the Plan It draft (except Ald. Diane Colley-Urquhart — see past post). A couple aldermen indicated that they plan to vote against it (Ray Jones and Jim Stevenson). Others are clearly unhappy with the plan (Dale Hodges, Andre Chabot, Ric McIver and Linda-Fox-Mellway). I don’t know Colley-Urquhart’s thoughts, but she hasn’t exactly showered the plan with praise in other media.
There are only a handful of clear supporters of the plan (Druh Farrell, Joe Ceci and Brian Pincott).
Then there’s a quartet of aldermen in the mealy-mouthed middle — Gord Lowe, Bob Hawkesworth, Joe Connelly (who, to be fair, seems pretty unimpressed by the plan) and John Mar.
As for the mayor, he says the “foundational work” of the plan is “headed in the right direction.” But Bronco also says the plan isn’t “etched in stone” and that city council will “refine the plans if refinements are required.”
Let’s look at the numbers. Let’s be generous and say that Farrell, Ceci, Pincott, Hawkesworth, Mar and Bronco all vote to implement Plan It. That’s six votes, and there are 15 votes on council. The supporters could be easily outnumbered nine to six.
Or look at it this way. Stevenson, Jones, Hodges, Connelly, Chabot, McIver and Fox-Mellway will clearly need a lot of convincing if they’re going to vote in favour of the plan. (I’m guessing Colley-Urquhart falls into this group too, but let’s be conservative and assume she’s undecided.) That’s seven votes. They only need to sway one more council member to have the commanding eight votes they need to spike the plan. Of course, it’s likely that the plan won't be spiked, but significantly amended or sent back to administration or who knows what else after the June 16 public hearing.
In any case, the future doesn’t look very bright for Plan It.
Suzy Thompson on Canine questionnaire5
chachiherbert on Canine questionnaire5
Wanda Fuca on A heart for AGC3
dejaview on A heart for AGC3
All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012
About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use
Comments: 1
Subvertisement wrote:
Most people have to remember that Calgary is not about communities, cultural development, and people at the end of the day, but cars, mini-malls, parking lots, and money. People have no idea about anything outside their ridiculous bubbles that have burst long ago now - and they would rather live in denial for as long as possible than face the truth and create a better future.
on May 8th, 2009 at 5:52pm Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)