Environment

Parks minister suspends proposed parks bill

The province is temporarily suspending debate on its controversial Alberta Parks Act, seeking more input from Albertans before moving ahead. 

The intent of Bill 29 was to “simplify,” “consolidate” and “modernize” Alberta’s numerous existing parks legislation, says Cindy Ady, Minister of Tourism, Parks and Recreation in a press release.

“What I have heard throughout debate on Bill 29 is that people are passionate about parks and I respect that passion,” says Ady. “We will continue our important work to ensure that parks protect our province’s unique natural heritage while also providing Albertans with access to ample outdoor recreation opportunities.”

Environmental and legal experts criticized the bill, arguing it would erode current environmental protections, open the door to further industrial and recreation intrusions and grant the parks minister sole power to change the rules with a 60-day public notice.

Today’s announcement was welcome news for Sarah Elmeligi, senior conservation planner for Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, who argues more in-depth consultation is warranted for such major overhauls to parks legislation.

“Today we can celebrate the fact our minister heard the voices of Albertans and took those voices to heed and decided to further consult Albertans to create this legislation,” says Elmeligi.

Elmeligi supports the province’s attempt to streamline the various legislations, but cautions laws protecting the most vulnerable wilderness and ecological areas must be included in future legislation as well as details as to what activities are permitted and not permitted in those areas.


more in News     |     posted Nov 25th, 2010 at 2:34pm     

Comments: 1

Lindsey Wallis wrote:

Definitely great news. It was suspected that part of the reason for the bill was to make the government look good when it brought in new protected areas in the Athabasca LUF -- like they were actually making an effort to protect widlife and habitat in Alberta.
If Bill 29 was passed, these new protected areas would, in fact, receive very little protection, being lumped together with every picnic area and "multi-use" zone in the province. You just have to look at the differences between an area like the Siffleur Wilderness, where there is NO motorized vehicle traffic period and ZERO industrial activity versus Kananaskis where there many roads, not to mention logging, grazing and oil and gas development to see why this bill was a bad idea.
Though it doesn't seem like much, this is a great step forward for the Alberta government and a sign that they are beginning to listen to voters.

on Nov 25th, 2010 at 2:57pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use