Race, representation and the rodeo

About a month before this year’s big centennial hootenany, I was in a business meeting with a publicist who does some work on the side for the Stampede. “You won’t recognize it,” he said of the many innovations and improvements made to the “Greatest Outdoor Show on Earth,” after I informed him that I hadn’t attended in a good 15 years or so.

So walking through the main gates the other night under that new, metallic tipi-like structure constructed to honour the Treaty 7 nations, I braced for even more surprises.

But there weren’t many — same old giant Ferris wheel (which doesn’t look quite so big anymore), same old Zipper (still just as terrifying as ever, if you ask this ground dweller), same old smell of horseshit. Fine by me, too. It was quite nostalgic. My biggest complaint was that the old jungle-themed funhouse with the giant gorilla on top was no longer part of the attractions — that’s not progress, in my books.

$100 in ride coupons and a dose of Gravol later (never, ever go on the Octopus with nothing but a mocha shake in your belly), it was a relief just to walk around a bit and take in some more sights. As we walked by the Mardi Gras–themed funhouse with its mural of an insanely endowed carnival performer, over to the equally busty frau on the Alpine-themed one, past the games hawking rasta-bananas with blunted, red eyes and into the BMO centre, where we spied belt buckles adorned with things like the Confederate flag or with the word ‘bitch’ spelled out in blingy glitter, it occurred to both my companion and I that some elements of this horse-drawn time-warp were much more reactionary and less benign than others.

Photobucket


The next day I got a text from a friend who happens to belong to one of those Treaty 7 nations honoured in the park’s entranceway — he was not impressed by the buckles either, but even less so by the new bronze horse statues. Apparently, one of them was called “Squaw Patch,” which as my friend reminded, employed a “derogatory term for First Nations’ women.”

I headed back to the grounds to see for myself — sure enough, there it was, but then I read the plaque, which explained that the names used for the statutes came from real horses that were “important in the history of the Stampede.”

Okay, then. Historical context. This was clearly a non-starter of story.

But, musing about it some more in search of cold drink back in the BMO, I thought, what if, hypothetically speaking, there was a historically accurate display that utilized the N-word?

Not the same thing?

Easy for me to say, but tell it to my friend.

Then I came across these little plush toys in a British themed candy store:


Photobucket

Ummmmm.

Perhaps a discussion of race and gender representation down on the grounds was in order after all.
 
What I came to learn about the issue is that, while it’s clearly on other peoples’ minds, the solutions aren’t all that black and white in some cases. Take the Indian Village, for example… Hal Eagle Tail of the Tsuu T’ina Nation is a seasoned performer with the rodeo (although he’s taking this year off, he sang with the hoop dancers for the previous five Stampedes in a row) and is also owner of a cultural consultancy business, Eagle Star Enterprises.  And Eagle Tail wants to see the First Nations' component of the exhibition get with the times.

“It’s just the word “Indian” that I have a problem with. It’s outdated terminology — it’s
getting to the point where the “I” word is like the “N” word is to the black people,” he says. “That’s where we’re getting to with this generation.”

However,  the resistance he and others who share the same mindset isn’t necessarily coming from the Stampede board, but from within his own community.

“Obviously it’s been there since the old days, and it was an acceptable word back then,” he says of the Indian Village. “And I think it’s just the elders that still like to be called that — ‘Indians.’ That’s what our elders grew up with, but it’s the next generation coming up, the younger ones that are now more associated with ‘first peoples,’ ‘first nations,’ and ‘native.’ That’s what we grew up with. That’s now the clashing point of the two cultures or the two generations.

“It’s really up to the tipi owners to make the change,” he continues. “Stampede certainly doesn’t have to listen to other organizations — as long as the village elders and tipi holders say keep it this way, it will be kept that way without any second thoughts.”

Eagle Tail says he hopes that when the village is relocated with the next expansion, that the move will affect a change for the better. In the mean time, he’s far from alienated and is prepared to continue to do his part in helping the Stampede evolve.

“My family and community has been involved since it started, and we will continue to be
involved in that respect,” he says. “I love to educate about the culture — whenever culture is part of the education process, it’s always a good thing.”

But as for all the other questionable images found on the midway? Well, in that case we’re all the tipi-holders too. Unless we speak up and ask for something better of this city’s defining attraction, things aren’t liable to be much different in years to come. (And, yeah, don't get me started on those dead horses... had enough Stampeding for now...)

Photobucket


more in Events     |     posted Jul 13th, 2012 at 4:08pm     

Comments: 10

sharklet wrote:

Thanks for this article. Many of these things have been on my mind, particularly why "Indian Village" is still used. I do hope change is coming soon. I was also thinking about how the term "Stampede Indian Princess" is a double-dose of cringe for me.

on Jul 15th, 2012 at 9:27pm Report Abuse

Agent666 wrote:

So, if they were little PINK plush dolls, that would be okay? And, if the 'Princess' bit bothers the PC crowd, might a 'Stampede First Nations PRINCE' be more acceptable?

As for 'Indian Village,' this is an historic term. Yes, Virginia--that was the acceptable (even to members of 'First Nations') word, when the first teepee was pitched at said venue. Should we burn all of the old books in which 'Indian,' 'Eskimo,' or any other politically incorrect term appears, then issue new, inclusively-reworked versions? They tried that with Mark Twain, remember? Really, there is something creepily Orwellian about endless politically correct revisions to language.

I was a university student during the 1990s, and remember political correctness, 'inclusiveness,' and other progressive nonsense at its zenith. On most campuses, including the U of C, it was verboten to discuss the Bering Strait migration theory of the settlement of North America, since--get this--it denied 'First Nations' creation myths. This was as nutty as the Scopes trial, but had the blessing of the PC crowd. Thankfully, the 1990s are over, and most people now consider political correctness laughable.

on Jul 15th, 2012 at 11:05pm Report Abuse

jwilt wrote:

I'm blown away by the privilege in your response, so let's get some stuff out of the way.

1. I'm a white, middle-class, cis-gender, able-bodied, male from a Christian background. There's my bias. What's yours?

2. Regarding the dolls: ever heard of a minstrel show?

3. I'm sure you can put the pieces together - because although I disagree completely with your opinions I can see that you can formulate an argument - but the prince/princess label has nothing to do with First Nations tradition. It's completely a British title - the imposition of it upon people who never called themselves that is a tad problematic.

4. No one is suggesting that we burn or censor books. That'd be like saying that we rid the world of Bibles just because it supported slavery and the executions of homosexuals - but we don't, because it's considered of literary worth. We're simply acknowledging the power inherent in the language we use (just look at the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis). Power is reinforced through the language we use, including "Indian" (a mistake of identities, as I'm sure you know).

5. Why is the concept of inclusiveness considered "progressive nonsense"? I'm very curious.

6. What's your evidence for most people considering political correctness laughable?

Alright, now it's your turn to make fun of my "tired catchphrases." Go.

on Jul 16th, 2012 at 10:31am Report Abuse

mgb wrote:

Seriously jwilt, why bother?

on Jul 16th, 2012 at 10:48am Report Abuse

jwilt wrote:

Good point. I should have learned from the creepy Snoop Dogg "debate."

on Jul 16th, 2012 at 11:02am Report Abuse

Agent666 wrote:

@jwilt, mgb,

Maybe you could tell those nice lads from the 'Indian Posse' (a seriously badass native gang, which now has a large presence in Calgary) to use a more 'inclusive' and politically correct name for their syndicate, when they tag property. I'm sure they'll listen to a nice white boy like you--they haven't listened to their own chiefs, who keep begging them not to do drive-bys of houses with children in them.

And I'm sorry, but when people use PC neologisms like 'cisgendered,' I have to laugh. And, going back to those little dolls, ever heard of Raggedy Ann? (Anti-ginger racism! Stop this!) I apologize if, unlike you (an admittedly WHITE person), I don't see racist subtext in the cloth choice of a rag doll.

As for Dog Poop, it appears that this convicted (drug, weapons, assault, sex trafficking) criminal and member of an antisemitic racist group made it through Customs after all:

http://www.ffwdweekly.com/calgary-blogs/culture/2012/07/16/snoop-doggs-stampede-ending-stoner-fest-1102/

Somehow, Russell Brand--who doesn't have a fraction of Dogg's violent, drug-soaked criminal record--ran afoul of our border authorities, so I guess there is a problem with 'inclusiveness,' after all.

on Jul 16th, 2012 at 2:33pm Report Abuse

jwilt wrote:

Do you ever read the news articles that you post about? Russell Brand was joking about being barred from Canada. C'mon man, at least pretend to know what you're talking about.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/story/2011/10/02/russell-brand-canada.html

Interestingly, this is the last paragraph of the CBC story. But you probably don't care. You're right, everyone else is wrong. We get it.

"A self-confessed heroin addict in recovery, Brand was arrested in 2001 and charged with criminal damage and indecent exposure after stripping naked while covering the May Day protests for MTV. Those charges were eventually dropped.

The comedian has a dozen arrests under his belt, including one for suspected battery charges after he allegedly attacked a photographer."

on Jul 16th, 2012 at 3:04pm Report Abuse

Agent666 wrote:

The battery charge occurred AFTER his tour, and yes, he did run into trouble with CBSA. So did many other artists. 'Snoop Dogg' really should have been barred from entering the country, on his weapons charges alone--unlike flashing your junk, or swatting a pap (the latter something even the sweet and boyish, all-Canadian Bieber has done), this is serious stuff.

Again, worrying about 'racist' rag dolls, or the use of the 'I' word for a venue is silly...especially if one (like everyone posting here) is a whitebread European-Canadian.

on Jul 16th, 2012 at 6:01pm Report Abuse

Meh wrote:

The little black dolls are a British cultural institutions called golliwoggs, not that this excuses their appearance.

It's too bad you didn’t see the Tails performance because it would have added a lot more meat to your article. It portrayed Guy Weadick as an actual cowboy (I don't think he was) and despite being narrated by Tom Jackson, it came off as problematic instead of being historical. It seemed heavy on mysticism for the first half and had a weird anti -farming bit .

on Aug 1st, 2012 at 6:24pm Report Abuse

Agent666 wrote:

on Aug 1st, 2012 at 7:48pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use