An editor's ramblings on anything I damn well please

Propaganda from the Sun

So a grant was given to support a movie that criticizes the tarsands and, naturally, conservatives and The Calgary Sun are up in arms. How could we!? The horror!?

If it weren't for the fact that the government is responding to this ridiculous situation, I wouldn't even bring it up for fear of lending it credence. But it's not just Rick Bell and the other sensationalists at The Calgary Sun who are puffing up their chests, Lindsay Blackett, the Alberta culture minister, who loves local film so much, is in a huff and so too is the premier.

So, it ought to be addressed.

First, what the hell is the problem? Arts grants are not a political mechanism to pick and choose the points of view that we want expressed. There is this little issue called freedom of speech that the government has no damn business interfering in. Period. Are we only supposed to support the government position? That doesn't sound like the society I want to be a part of.

The naysayers scream that we are funding propaganda and then, in the same breath, say that we ought to fund things that are more positive towards the tarsands. So, only government and industry propaganda then? I'm confused. Earlier this year, Stelmach et al poured $56,000 into pro-tarsands propaganda in the Washington Post, but I suppose that was money well spent.

Even in Bell's outraged and moronic ranting, he admits the film has been extremely well-received by critics and audiences. So, we're supposed to be upset that the Alberta government has provided funding ($50,000) to a film that is supposed to be good?

But that's not the point. As a third-generation Calgarian, I thought I would have been invited to the meeting where all us Albertans decided that we were strong supporters of the tarsands. But I wasn't, and I'm not. I know a lot of Albertans that feel the same way. I think the tarsands are a black mark on our province (and no, I'm not arguing that they are dirtier than every other crude deposit in the world etc...)

We have failed to monitor development, let things run wild up north during the boom without thinking of the consequences and we have polluted our air and waterways in the name of profits, of which we don't see enough return. Remember Our Fair Share? Didn't think so.

There are a lot of Albertans, myself included, that applaud giving money to a film that questions the industry that drives so much profit into government coffers that they should just do away with the masquerade and call themselves the government already.

Taxpayer money given to this film is money well-spent in my mind and no matter what the tired, out-of-touch Conservatives in Edmonton, or the tired old conservatives in The Sun say, not all Albertans support the tarsands.


more in Viewpoint     |     posted Sep 1st, 2010 at 3:51pm     

Comments: 5

officematt2002 wrote:

Rick Bell wrote a piece worth noting? He had a legitimate thought? That guy is a muckraker at its worst: He just stirs the pot, makes people pissed off, and then does nothing to investigate the problem. Just a lame journalist. Just look at what was done regarding the City audit. If he had the gonads, he would have found the issue, had half the City administration sacked and been up for some sort of award, but yet he would rather just move onto the next issue, city parking, blah blah blah.

on Sep 1st, 2010 at 9:50pm Report Abuse

Drew Anderson wrote:

No, Rick Bell did not write a piece worth noting. But the issue is worth it and the government is responding to it as a valid issue, which makes it important to write about and note.

On another point, I've spoken with someone from The Sun and do have to concede one valid issue raised: not everyone that works at that paper deserves to be characterized in this way. There are intelligent folks working there that don't deserve to be wrapped in the same cloth as Rick Bell, or lumped in with the overall editorial direction of the paper. But I stick by my criticism of the paper writ large.

on Sep 2nd, 2010 at 2:10pm Report Abuse

officematt2002 wrote:

I'm with you on that.

on Sep 3rd, 2010 at 1:28am Report Abuse

Lawrence A. Oshanek wrote:

Now I personally know Rick Bell .... it's not a mutual admiration society ... but no one at the Sun has been willing to print my name except for Kevin Martin when he writes about some of the court cases I have paid for and argued on the behalf of poor and younger others.

Censorship in all it's forms is insidious and must be opposed ... in 1999 I opposed Mr. Harvey Kane and the Jewish Defence League of Canada in the Court of Queens Bench in this case:

http://www.albertacourts.ab.ca/jdb/1998-2003/qb/Civil/2001/2001abqb0570.pdf

The issues were freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Didn't like what the Alberta Report wrote but I supported their right to say it ... additionally, I was granted "Intervener Status" at the Alberta Human Rights Commission hearings in that matter and in others which I have stuck my nose in on the basis of democratic principle.

You would think it strange that a man so active in the community as I have been in the defense of human, civil and legal rights for about 42 years would be published at least several times a year ... but, I had to run for mayor before even FastForward would do any story on me and I had to share story that with several others.

What I do is really not that bad for a fellow thrown out of grade 10 ... maybe that is why the Calgary Sun never told you I was a candidate for mayor!
Threat to the educational system, what! Hahahaha

Down with the elitists and up with democracy!

Vote on October 18!

Lawrence A. Oshanek
Oshanek for Mayor




on Sep 10th, 2010 at 7:25pm Report Abuse

Just Jonathan wrote:

Well put Lawrence !

I disliked "The Dingers" soapbox story about the movie and concur with Drew's point of view.

on Sep 16th, 2010 at 11:57am Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2011

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use