An editor's ramblings on anything I damn well please
This makes me sad, and a little happy as well. Vancouver is so close to us and yet a million miles away in terms of its progressive view on bikes and the role these simple machines can play in improving our urban environment.
Dedicated two-way bike lanes separated from traffic!? Calgary's idea of a bike lane is a poorly demarcated line on a road that nobody can see or recognize. Oh, and most of them are non-existent after a couple of winters of snow removal without being touched up.
City council pays a lot of lip service to alternative transportation, including cycling, but they don't have anything to really show for it. Why, for example, is the new East Village development lacking bike lanes? Sure the path is right there, but I assume people will want to ride through this "vibrant" urban atmosphere if it's ever fabricated into existence.
I see yet another addition to Vancouver's increasingly impressive bike infrastructure (just ride there once and you'll understand) and I just shake my head at the commute that lies ahead of me. Come on Calgary, help a cyclist out.
For more on the opening of the new bike lane, read the Globe and Mail artilce here.
Lawrence A. Oshanek on No money. No team. No chance. No problem.1
Subvertisement on Shortest book review, evah4
Subvertisement on River of Light8
Kirstin_M on Nenshi’s campaign-financing disclosure explanation sounds like a ‘crock,’ says Hehr5
All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2010
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use
Comments: 5
Sally wrote:
I suspect that most of the problem is with the way the city administration deals with cyclists. most mentions of bicycles on the city website are under the recreation department's heading and focuses on pathways. there is a 'cycling' page buried deep in the transportation department section, which offers this gem of advice on planning your trip via bike, " There are several Park and Bike sites around town allowing you to drive part of the way.
on Jun 17th, 2010 at 9:49am Report Abuse
Drew Anderson wrote:
I think the disappearing bike lanes are a personal favourite as well.
But, credit where credit is due, I do love our pathway system. I just wish they put that much effort in roadway paths for bikes for people that actually commute.
on Jun 17th, 2010 at 10:15am Report Abuse
KennaBurima wrote:
For the Love of My Bike (This is not a love letter to the City of Calgary)
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/note.php?note_id=399374835962
on Jun 17th, 2010 at 12:42pm Report Abuse
Drew Anderson wrote:
I think we need to give city hall a lot of lip service of our own leading up to the election. Who knows, might actually do something.
And thanks for the kudos.
on Jun 17th, 2010 at 1:39pm Report Abuse
critninja wrote:
The most we could hope for is the type of painted bike lane that has a wide margin on the left side (about 2-3 ft) between the cyclist and cars - similar to what exists in Portland - http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PsfYO2kvTAI/Sq8FTk0xJnI/AAAAAAAAEug/SpOCh4BZztM/s400/photos+643.jpg Keep in mind that the city would have to remove onstreet parking to make something like this happen - do you think anyone in the city has the appetite for that fight?
It is really easy to blame the city and politicains - but also important to remember that those same politicians react to what their constituents want - and sadly, the majority Calgarians want more roads, more suburbs, and more sprawl.
All we can do is keep riding on the roads, claim your space, don't be a gutter bunny - and get involved with one of the bike advocacy groups in the city. They desparately need more people pushing the cycling agenda forward.
Ride!
on Jun 21st, 2010 at 9:27am Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)