Economic growth no longer delivering the goods

Well-being is being left behind in quest for more

“Growth for the sake of growth doesn’t interest me.” Well, what’s this, another wacky environmentalist spouting nonsense? No, it’s actually Steve Williams, the CEO of Suncor, quoted on the cover of the September edition of Alberta Oil. While Mr. Williams was not really taking on the idea of growth, he does suggest that growth must have a purpose.

Two recently released Canadian reports have converged on the question of growth and its purpose. Both present compelling evidence suggesting that in Canada, growth and well-being might be at odds.

Last week, The Canadian Index of Wellbeing (CIW) released its 2012 report on 64 indicators of well-being. It includes measures of community vitality, health, education, leisure and culture, living standards and the environment.

The CIW report “uncovers some troubling truths about the connection between our well-being and the economy.” The CIW finds that “as the gap between those at the top and those at the bottom continues to grow in Canada… societies with greater inequality are shown to have worse health and well-being outcomes.” And that since 2008, “even though the economy as measured by GDP is in slow recovery, the well-being of Canadians continues to decline.”

The CIW also reports that since 1994 the health of our environment, as measured by indicators such as ocean diversity (down five per cent), ground level ozone (up six per cent), greenhouse gas emissions (up 10 per cent) and our ecological footprint (up 17 per cent), has deteriorated. The authors point out that “the environment domain speaks volumes about the tension between the relentless pursuit of economic growth and the finite reality of a planet experiencing massive climate change and dwindling natural resources.”

One of the most oft-repeated refrains in Canadian political debate is that health care is a drain on the economy. It is hard not to conclude just the opposite — that the economy is making us (and the planet) sick. In a report released this week by Carleton University researcher Linda Duxbury, we find evidence of just that. In Revisiting Life-Work Issues in Canada, Duxbury reports on two decades of research into work-life stress.

She finds that, since 1992, levels of stress for Canadian workers have gone up and life satisfaction has gone down. And no wonder — over half of surveyed employees “take work home to complete outside regular hours.” Employees reported that work regularly interfered with family life and that work-life conflict is associated with “higher absenteeism and lower productivity.” Yet, for all this effort by workers “there has been little career mobility within Canadian firms over the past several years.” It should come as no surprise that the evidence shows women bear the brunt of work-life conflicts.

The 2011 Sustainable Calgary State of Our City report and the Calgary Foundation’s 2012 Vital Signs report are consistent with both Duxbury and the CIW.

We see lots of signs of economic growth in Calgary, and not all of them good. Anyone who commutes via the over-subscribed LRT has experienced the downside of growth. What about getting to the airport, or anywhere else on the Deerfoot, during the ever-expanding ‘rush hour’? Against our better judgement, urban sprawl continues to eat up farmland. Yet our provincial government, through its tarsands land lease policies, low tax regimes and deregulation, promotes economic growth without any objective assessment of its contribution to well-being.

Maybe Suncor’s CEO was on to something without realizing it. The prescription for well-being in Calgary, might just be to chill out. Apply the brakes to economic expansion or at least stop stoking the fires of growth.

As Janine Benyus, author of Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Design, so eloquently mused: “Restraint is not a popular notion in a society addicted to ‘growing’ the economy, but it is one of the most powerful practices we can adopt at this point in history.”

 


Comments: 6

AP wrote:

One of the things that has also grown on this entire planet is the population. Humanity has grown exponentially from 3 billion in the 1950s to 6 billion in the 1990s and is touching on 7 billion now.

Every new child that takes breath in this world has to fight for the resources to survive, thrive, grow and progress. And denying them any of those opportunities is wrong and inhumane.

So while it is true that the environment is taxed and our global footprint is expanding, it is all due to an expanding population that demands more resources just to sustain itself.

One of the most important solutions to all of this is to encourage family planning and controlled population grown - in all nations, but especially the ones in the Third World like India and China that have burgeoning economies of their own. And this has to be done both at the global level through the United Nations, and at the grassroots level through NGOs and interactions with the local communities.

on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:09am Report Abuse

rube wrote:

"Burgeoning" is a funny word choice to describe the second largest economy in the world.

on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:09am Report Abuse

Ron wrote:

Re: AP comment. Actually, the world human population hit 3,000,000,000 in 1968. It passed 7,000,000,000 last year and grows by 245,000 every day (almost 3 humans per SECOND). By far the greatest threat to the environment and quality of life for humanity and all of the life on the planet is human over-population. This has been said since Thomas Malthus, but nothing substantive has been done to ease the growth. Not even the two bloodiest wars in history were adequate to stem the tide of evermore humans. I really feel, as expressed in the old Elton John song "I have no wish to be living Sixty Years On."

on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:54pm Report Abuse

Agent666 wrote:

A big issue, re. population, is the reality that there are limits to the ecological load-carrying capacity of areas. Southern Alberta passed the population sustainability point a long time ago, as local water supplies can NOT sustainably accommodate even the current population. When the next dust bowl hits (and it will--these are cyclical events), we're hosed. And less than 5% of Canada's land is arable, with much of this land in Southern areas near major metro hubs (GTA, Calgary, Lower Mainland).

Unless so-called environmentalists get their heads out of their @$$3s, nothing constructive can be done. Right now, environmental debate is censored by a politically correct avoidance of population and immigration. Every year, since the late 1980s, Canada has admitted OVER HALF A MILLION people: more than 250,000 permanent immigrants, plus well over 300,000 'temporary' migrants (most of whom never leave). This policy was the result of lobbying by the financial and real estate lobby, and does NOT reflect the needs of Canadians outside these sectors. And this is the primary driver of urban sprawl, as well as escalating water consumption. Compare the demographics of newer communities (Taradale, Redstone) to inner-city neighborhoods (Sunnyside, Ramsay) and the politically correct denials about mass immigration and urban sprawl shrivel. We need an open debate about immigration policy in this country.

on Nov 5th, 2012 at 6:26pm Report Abuse

Nkeough wrote:

There is a lot of discussion on immigration on my most recent columns - and it seems to come up quite often in previous column comments. First, yes human population is an issue. Just as with economic growth it cannot go on forever on a finite planet. But, it is a more complicated issue than most of the discussion here would suggest. I would suggest that at the root of population growth is the problem of economic growth. How so? The insatiable desire for more and more stuff - that has to be made from more and more resources - has meant that the western countries foreign policies have too often been oppressive of other nations in the world. In colonial times and now in neo-colonial times (economic colonialism, global economy, neo-liberalism and all that) the economic imperative is to extract resources around the world at the lowest possible price. In doing so we make life so unbearable for many people that one of the few alternatives is to immigrate to a better place - ie countries who have stolen the resources of their home country. A good clue to this is the fact that Calgary's Ecological Footprint of about 9 ha per capita means that we would need 4-5 planets for every human to live as we do. We are appropriating far more than our fair share of the earths resources. That is also a physical impossibility. Furthermore the research is pretty solid that if you give women and girls more freedom economically and over their own reproductive choices birth rates go down. Of course it is a complicated issue but I would suggest we not point fingers and instead have a debate in our own culture about our role in the problem and how to become part of the solution.

on Nov 5th, 2012 at 9:47pm Report Abuse

Ron wrote:

The problem derives from the culture of conspicuous consumption - rabid consumerism - that has been allowed to proceed unfettered for many decades. And that is an unintended or unforseen consequence of Martin Luther nailing his criticisms of the Catholic Church on the door of Wittenberg's Stadtkirche 495 years ago. He just wanted reform. He never intended to cause the revolution that became the Protestant Reformation. But he opened a real Pandora's Box of free thinking. Once opened, it could not be closed again, no matter who tried. The prevailing religious philosophy did not suit the desires of the newly-freed minds. So they just changed the religion. Ain't self-service grand?

on Nov 10th, 2012 at 10:50pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use