U of C students Jane Ballegooyen (l) and Amanda Winters are considering switching to a lower-cost university
She’s a first-year University of Calgary law student who aims to work in the not-for-profit sector helping the downtrodden. But the university’s plan to hike tuition almost 47 per cent for some students could force Amanda Winters to abandon that noble pursuit.
“If I have to spend all my time paying off my debt, then I can’t work with these organizations because I won’t have time and that’s a real concern for me,” she says.
The university recently dropped a last-minute bombshell by proposing to raise tuition for five professional degrees: business, education, medicine, law and engineering. And for all students, it proposes a $500 “compulsory fee.”
Under Alberta legislation, institutions don’t need the province’s approval to increase tuition at the same rate as inflation — 1.5 per cent last year. However, faced with government funding cutbacks, a $78-million hit to the university’s endowment fund and cost overruns on several large projects, the university is pushing to hike tuition closer to that of top Canadian universities.
If approved, that would mean an annual increase of $200 to $4,000 for engineering and medical students, respectively. The figures are not yet set in stone, as university officials are now scrambling to present a written proposal to the province before the government releases its budget February 9.
“With the jump, I’m going to be paying close to $14,000 in tuition at the U of C,” says Winters. “If I go to the University of British Columbia, I’m paying less than $10,000. When students have this kind of debt-load, we want to help the public but we can’t afford it. It’s really shortsighted.”
According to Statistics Canada, the average student debt rose to $18,800 from $15,200 between 1995 and 2005. The number of students with debt loads of $25,000 or more also increased during that period to 27 per cent, up from 17 per cent.
Hit with a barrage of questions from frustrated students for more than an hour at a meeting on February 2, Alan Harrison, a top university official, responded by saying the school doesn’t have much choice other than raising tuition. The university, he said, lacks government funding and is facing a huge deficit, $14.3 million for 2008-2009.
“If all these increases were put into effect we would still be in the middle of the pack in comparison to competing universities,” the university provost told the crowd. He said the U of C is competing with top universities, including Queen’s, McGill and McMaster universities — then claimed his university offers the same educational quality of those more expensive schools.
The latter remark drew a chorus of boos and laughter from 1,000 students, most of whom are appalled and furious about the proposed hikes.
“He’s comparing us to a school like Queen’s? Are you kidding me?” says Jane Ballegooyen, a fourth-year business student. “I had a professor who took the course she is now teaching last semester in order to teach it to us. She wasn’t a good professor.” As well, classes have recently become so large, business school students end up sitting on the floor, she says, adding, “What quality is that?”
Winters pressed the provost to justify the proposed tuition hike for law students, especially for those who want to work for non-governmental organizations (NGO) that typically don’t pay the large salaries corporations offer. Harrison answered by saying a $6,000 hike in tuition wouldn’t likely influence a student’s decision about a career that could span 30 years. “Sorry, it just isn’t that big of a sum of money in the context,” he said. “If people wish to pursue positions that do not involve the sort of money that many people can make when they graduate from law, then that’s their choice.”
Harrison’s frank and harsh remarks drew the ire of the students’ union (SU). “There was a lot of glibness frankly around a lot of the real concerns they have about their lives, like whether they will be able to pursue public or NGO work,” says SU president Charlotte Kingston. “To see that so easily dismissed was really hurtful to a lot of people in this room and outside of it.”
There’s a “gross” underestimation of how highly students value other school options, Kingston says. “Students thought Mount Royal was a great establishment before it was a university and now that they have the option of pursuing a degree there you’ll see a lot of them choose that,” she predicts. “On top of that, Mount Royal has somehow managed to balance its budget while staying well within the tuition-fee regulation, which is something I think students will consider when they wonder whether they can trust the institution they’ve chosen.”
The U of C lost $78 million on investments when the financial markets tanked in 2008. As well, it was revealed last year that former university president Harvey Weingarten was awarded a $4.5 million pension. Alberta auditor general Fred Dunn, who openly accused university officials of trying to conceal the “handshake” agreement, lambasted the deal.
Ballegooyen says she’s now seriously looking at attending other schools to finish her degree. “My first choice for business school was the University of British Columbia because it’s on par with what I can pay and I feel they have better quality. If I had the option now whether to go to UBC or the U of C, I for sure would go to UBC, even Mount Royal University.”

Comments: 4
Lou R wrote:
Universities are businesses and need to make money and profit. No profit equals no development, no advancements. It is nice that Amanda Winters wants to work in the non-profit sector when she finishes. It is a choice she has amde and she should be applauded. Not everyone is willing to make that commitment. However, it is not the university's job to support her endeavour except by providing her the necessary education. It is her or perhaps society's responsibility. Societies response comes in the form of money from government or other parties interested in her choices. If the money isn't there is says something about our interest in Amanda's choices.
The quality of education doesn't have a substantial place in this discussion. If the education provided does not have enough value, change universities. Just like any customer making a business choice. If the career path you have chosen doesn't have the value stretched over acareer of a low priced car then perhaps the protesting students have used poor a deficient value system when their choice was made.
Lou Rosenfeld
on Feb 7th, 2010 at 8:19am Report Abuse
Zdenek wrote:
Although this is very much the case, it is unfortunate that this is how our society views educational institutions. Compare this to Europe where education is seen as an end in itself and not as a means. I think that people, including governments and universities, need to change the way they approach post-secondary institutions. The value of education should not be reduced to percentages and market rates. It has inherent value and should be recognized as such.
The unjustified increases to tuition makes higher education accessible only to a privileged few. In a society where competition is the norm, many people are necessarily marginalized. Although this can't be avoided, this should never be the case when it comes to education.
on Feb 7th, 2010 at 1:53pm Report Abuse
ECD wrote:
on Feb 10th, 2010 at 6:11pm Report Abuse
000000000000000000000 wrote:
Also, why is the University still accepting students from the PRC--their tuition subsidised by the parents of Calgarian students--when the Chinese government refuses to recognise the U of C's degrees?
on Feb 10th, 2010 at 8:23pm Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)