Valerie Cooper, the former president and CEO of the Art Gallery of Calgary (AGC), who left her post suddenly without explanation in March, is being sued by the gallery in order to retrieve $500,000 it alleges Cooper stole from the non-profit in the form of falsified expenses starting in 2006.
The civil suit against Cooper, outlined in court documents obtained by Fast Forward Weekly, alleges she charged the gallery for a litany of expenses, from massages and parking, to $12,126 worth of artwork that, according to an affidavit by board chair Gwen Randall, ended up on Cooper’s condo walls, $185,129 of “fictitious framing,” $66,978 of unauthorized travel, $89,250 towards rent on her downtown condo, and non-existent loan repayments to the tune of $124,000.
The allegations were first brought to the attention of AGC board member David Rehn by the Calgary Police Service. “On March 13th, 2012, Mr. Rehn reported to a meeting of the Board of Directors for the AGC that at a meeting with the Calgary Police Service, he had been shown a series of invoices on the letterhead of Masters Gallery, which is a commercial gallery and framing service in the City of Calgary. The invoices totalled $106,515.11. The invoices were handwritten and described numerous framing assignments and the purchase of pieces of original art. Each of the invoices in question was marked paid,” reads the affidavit by AGC board chair Gwen Randall.
The statement goes on to say that Rehn was then shown information from Cooper’s personal bank account, accessed through a court order, that shows cheques from the AGC for those amounts were deposited into Cooper’s account.
When contacted by Fast Forward Weekly, a staff member at Masters Gallery said no one would comment on the matter, and that everyone was busy and would be for some time.
Former staff members of the AGC who were contacted by Fast Forward Weekly would not speak on the record, fearing legal repercussions. None of those contacted said they were surprised by the allegations, and some had left the gallery due to ethical concerns.
The AGC has been tight-lipped on Cooper’s departure. The gallery didn’t even acknowledge the vacancy until the end of March when the statement of claim against Cooper was filed with the Court of Queen’s Bench in Calgary, despite the fact she was put on administrative leave on March 13.
Brian Hearst, who was the board treasurer and is currently the managing director of the gallery, wouldn’t comment on Cooper’s departure when contacted at the beginning of April.
Fast Forward Weekly has repeatedly attempted to contact Hearst since acquiring the documents, as well as board members Randall and Rehn. According to Nisha Sridhar, manager of communications and marketing at the AGC, the board was travelling in Russia on an art tour and members were unavailable.
There are questions around the “non-approved travel” expenses listed in a “funds recoverable analysis” conducted by Hearst, who is a chartered accountant, after the allegations were first brought to the board by the police. In March 2008, Cooper travelled to Jerusalem for a World Federation of Friends of Museums congress, where she spoke on a panel with Donale Gandossi, a current AGC board member who was board chair at the time. The trip was highlighted by Gandossi in the gallery’s 2008 annual report. It’s unclear why $1,364 of expenses for that trip are included as non-approved travel when the chair was with Cooper at the time.
There are other questions related to board oversight. How was Cooper allegedly able to reimburse herself for $124,000 of loans that never existed? If the allegations are true, how was she able to submit handwritten invoices totalling over $100,000 without raising a red flag?
According to Randall’s affidavit, the reason was misplaced trust. “From the time of the commencement of her employment, the Defendant cultivated personal relationships with a number of the members of the Board of Directors of the AGC, including this deponent,” reads the document. “Because of a personal relationship between the Defendant and members of the Board of Directors, and because of the complete trust imposed by the Board of Directors upon the Defendant to manage the affairs of the AGC, neither I, nor other members of the Board, to my knowledge, had any reason to suspect that the Defendant was converting AGC funds to her personal use.”
The statement of claim filed with the court says that the board received constant reports on the gallery’s “dire financial straits” from Cooper, and that “from time to time other members of the Board did in fact make personal loans, without interest, to the Plaintiff [AGC] to cover operating expenses pending receipt of grant funds.”
Although there were rumours in the arts community about financial irregularities at the gallery, there was never any evidence to back up those claims. Perusing the online comments on a 2008 Fast Forward Weekly story on problems at the gallery shows a number of people concerned about the gallery’s finances.
In that same story, issues including employee intimidation, damage to artwork, a focus on fundraising over programming and the high turnover of staff, particularly in curators, were highlighted. Considering the amount of evidence that something was amiss in the gallery’s management, how was it that Cooper maintained the trust of the board?
In addition to the allegations that Cooper made off with a sizable chunk of money, Randall’s affidavit also says that the AGC security cameras caught Cooper returning to the gallery after she was suspended and recorded her departure five hours later. “The video tape clearly shows the Defendant leaving the AGC with two cardboard boxes,” reads the statement. “AGC has been unable to locate its payables file for the year 2012. Certain personnel files of employees of AGC also cannot be located.”
The gallery has requested the return of the materials, but has yet to see the documents.
Const. Tanya Bertulli of the Economic Crimes Unit of the Calgary Police Service would only say that there is an active investigation into the allegations against Cooper. No criminal charges have been laid and the allegations against Cooper laid out in the civil suit by the Art Gallery of Calgary have yet to be proven in court.
When reached by telephone, Cooper curtly declined to comment on the matter.


Comments: 26
JulietBurgess wrote:
I would hate it if these allegations turned out to be true and I hope the Defendant is held responsible if so. Taking money from a not for profit arts organization... ugh.
Working in the arts myself, I hear the number $500,000.00 and think of what that could've done for Calgary. :(
on May 3rd, 2012 at 10:01am Report Abuse
badgovernance wrote:
There are other questions related to board oversight. How was Cooper allegedly able to reimburse herself for $124,000 of loans that never existed? If the allegations are true, how was she able to submit handwritten invoices totalling over $100,000 without raising a red flag?"
To me, the story raises real questions about the Board's oversight. They may have some questions to answer as well.
on May 3rd, 2012 at 11:05am Report Abuse
poonani wrote:
on May 3rd, 2012 at 12:21pm Report Abuse
wha? wrote:
on May 3rd, 2012 at 1:51pm Report Abuse
CreativelyImpaired wrote:
Until recently, I worked as a staff member at a restaurant that is a block away from the gallery. Many staff members from the AGC, including Valarie herself were regulars and I was privy to many private conversations regarding internal concerns within the gallery.
Most concerning were stories regarding staff feeling personally intimidated and felt that they worked for a 'crazy person', (in reference to Valerie). I will not go into detail about the conversations I was included in, as it is all heresay but I knew that something was going on.
on May 3rd, 2012 at 1:55pm Report Abuse
CharlotteSometimes wrote:
It's time to dismiss the board of directors and let forensic accountants come in to investigate. It's hard to believe that no one on the board suspected anything. The police should charge everyone who was involved directly and those who aided her by turning a blind eye to the ACG's creative accounting practices. The gallery should be shut down. After all, who would want to support this "charity" now?
on May 3rd, 2012 at 2:49pm Report Abuse
pejorative35 wrote:
on May 3rd, 2012 at 7:57pm Report Abuse
Drew Anderson wrote:
on May 4th, 2012 at 10:30am Report Abuse
mojo2u wrote:
on May 4th, 2012 at 10:49am Report Abuse
GalleryMan wrote:
on May 4th, 2012 at 8:26pm Report Abuse
casiomatrixsets wrote:
on May 5th, 2012 at 10am Report Abuse
casiomatrixsets wrote:
on May 5th, 2012 at 10:03am Report Abuse
officematt2002 wrote:
Good to see this story come to light. I hope the CPS presses charges and doesn't succumb to pressure from City Hall.
on May 5th, 2012 at 10:42am Report Abuse
headshake wrote:
The art community needs to recognize the value in having an exhibition space such as the AGC in Calgary. Buy a membership at AGC, demand a general meeting and join the board. Ask questions about where the money is going.
The City of Calgary appointed CADA to be responsible for distributing municipal dollars to cultural institutions and to make sure these funds where not miss used, What happen? A 1/2 a million dollars has been removed from the Calgary Arts community.
It is common knowledge that the art community was very aware of the way the AGC executive was operating. As early as 2008 concerns of the AGC's executive practices where communicated to CADA.
If you are in the arts in Calgary demand answers and demand to be involved. The arts funding system in Canada ensures that artists have a place at the table, if we fail to get involved then we are allowing the cycle to continue. Stop the Calgary art community from looking so stupid to the rest of the country.
on May 5th, 2012 at 11:24am Report Abuse
Drew Anderson wrote:
@officematt2002: advertising revenue trumping looking into city hall? Right, um.
on May 5th, 2012 at 5:41pm Report Abuse
headshake wrote:
My point was that individuals can and should get involved in how our money is spent.
on May 7th, 2012 at 9:34am Report Abuse
Drew Anderson wrote:
on May 7th, 2012 at 9:56am Report Abuse
pejorative35 wrote:
Some of us are interested in having a say, but only if the entire board resigns. There is nothing to prevent the same thing from happening again with this board. Also, the lack of knowledge of how things are done in civic galleries in other cites is not going to change until they leave.
on May 8th, 2012 at 10:08am Report Abuse
Drew Anderson wrote:
on May 8th, 2012 at 10:23am Report Abuse
pejorative35 wrote:
on May 8th, 2012 at 11:49am Report Abuse
dejaview wrote:
on May 9th, 2012 at 6:50pm Report Abuse
officematt2002 wrote:
on May 10th, 2012 at 6:32pm Report Abuse
Drew Anderson wrote:
on May 10th, 2012 at 7:34pm Report Abuse
headshake wrote:
It is so easy to throw a brick at the AGC right now, but what it really needs is for people like pejorative35 to buy a membership, don't wait for the board to go, don't hide in the bushes.
I agree Cooper and the board are a joke and CADA is a joke for not listening to the art communities warnings. But AGC is not a joke, there are way too many decent people who have contributed to the arts in Calgary via the AGC and they deserve a bit more respect .
And Drew Anderson is a star for being one of the few in the press that is talking about this story, thank you for that.
on May 11th, 2012 at 4:47pm Report Abuse
pejorative35 wrote:
on May 12th, 2012 at 11:09am Report Abuse
pejorative35 wrote:
on May 12th, 2012 at 11:19am Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)