Harper's mentor advocates assassination

Flanagan feeling 'very manly' when making glib comment

Remember when being a “man” meant holding down a job, bringing home the bacon, paying the bills, raising a family and being a pillar in the community?

Those days are apparently gone. If you want to feel “very manly” these days, do what University of Calgary professor Tom Flanagan does: advocate the assassination of a private citizen from the comfortable confines of a TV studio.

Appearing on CBC’s Power and Politics to discuss the latest dumping of classified U.S. documents by whistleblower website Wikileaks, Flanagan called for its founder, Julian Assange, to be hunted down and murdered by the Obama administration.

“Well, I think Assange should be assassinated actually,” Flanagan told CBC Power and Politics host Evan Solomon. “I think Obama should put out a contract and maybe use a drone or something.”

“I’m feeling very manly today Evan,” said Flanagan, a senior advisor and strategist for Prime Minister Stephen Harper, before conceding the “vast sum of (document) pages, most of it is probably harmless.”

“I wouldn’t feel unhappy if Assange disappeared,” he said.

Flanagan did not respond to Fast Forward Weekly’s interview requests, but did send a statement to the CBC saying he regrets his “glib comment.”

 


Comments: 11

Daniel wrote:

Trevor Scott Howell is probably the kind of person that would be shocked if I called some idiot acting stupid, "a retard" and would instantly assume I am somehow disparaging handicapped people...grow a set Howell

I believe that governments and individuals like Flanagan and Palin and Clinton are way too terrified of what was released and I am more interested in the rape allegations made against Julian Assange...did the condom break or didn't it?

on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 1:06pm Report Abuse

Zdenek wrote:

As a student at the U of C, I am incredibly ashamed of Tom Flanagan's comments, and hope the university will consider his dismissal because of them. Tom Flanagan's comments are utterly reprehensible.

To publicly will the death of someone, regardless of the issue, is an end that I would hope none of the professors at the U of C advocate. The University of Calgary should not in any way encourage or tolerate the direct assassination of an individual to deal with a diplomatic or political crisis. This is contrary—I would hope—to the values that we as students are encouraged to develop and that professors are encouraged to teach.

As Tom Flanagan is a professor in the political science department, it is disconcerting that someone in his position has such base thoughts. My fellow students and any potential students who strive to build a better world justly and responsibly are being done a great disservice by Tom Flanagan's continual employment. The university should be an environment that promotes and encourages the cultivation of values contrary to what has been declared by Mr. Flanagan.

on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 7:25pm Report Abuse

Clairvoyant wrote:

"The university should be an environment that promotes and encourages the cultivation of values ..."

Should one of those values be free speech? Even if that speech may not be warm & fuzzy and politically correct? Think the anti-abortionists. Think Ann Coulter.

So let's take your lemon of Professor Flanagan advocating, seriously or not, assassination. And make it a debate on campus: is assassination ever justified? if yes, under what circumstances? Never? "regardless of the issue"? Would bumping off Hitler be better than the Munich agreement? Was the attempt to assassinate Hitler by German military officers wrong? Did Brutus et al. hurt or help Rome by doing in Caesar? Would assassinating Stalin have prevent the Holodomor? And maybe you can have the same debate on torture ... and have former prof M.I. chair the debates?

The university should value openness, and debate: not censorship.

on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 9:29pm Report Abuse

officematt2002 wrote:

The use of the word advocating is pretty damn strong here and takes us down the wrong road. Enough of the liberal outrage at everything said by anyone remotely conservative.

on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 6:09am Report Abuse

bohunk wrote:

I'm outraged you said that.

on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 6:12am Report Abuse

tshowell wrote:

Really? Advocating is too strong of a word and takes us down the wrong road? Sorry to affront your delicate sensibilities, but let us examine the definition of said offensive word.

advocate: to speak or write in favor of; support or urge by argument; recommend publicly

Now let us look at Flanagan's "glib" solution to Julian Assange.

assassinate: to kill suddenly or secretively, esp. a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously

Which one is "pretty damn strong" and takes us down the wrong road again?

on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 9:16am Report Abuse

HeavyMetalHeathen wrote:

Flanagan's a scrawny wimp. I could kick his ass.

on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 9:18am Report Abuse

officematt2002 wrote:

Okay folks who have reading comprehension issues: The author of this story used the word advocate. That is pretty liberal usage of the word in light of what was really said. Making news out of nothing as usual. Assange deserves whatever he gets. He is nothing more than a bootlick.

on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 11:38am Report Abuse

rube wrote:

Bootlick: One who behaves in a servile or obsequious manner.

on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 11:49am Report Abuse

Agent666 wrote:

This was a bad joke, folks--get over it. Meanwhile, Obama gets a pass, for joking about whacking the Jonas Brothers with Predator drones:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWKG6ZmgAX4

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/05/04/wapo-asks-was-obamas-jonas-brothers-drone-joke-offensive

Funny how the Jonases never called for charges against Obama.

on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 4:14pm Report Abuse

Subvertisement wrote:

I'm always amazed by how many rednecks seem to read FFWD. I would have thought FFWD was redneck-repellent.

on Dec 11th, 2010 at 11:43pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use