Frack this, time to review

NDP calls for a deeper look at fracking in Alberta

The Alberta NDP has renewed its call for a scientific review of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) technology. NDP environment critic Rachel Notley says an independent, science-based review is necessary because uncertainty about the risks associated with fracking are exaggerated in Alberta due to the number of abandoned well sites across the province.

“We just think it’s irresponsible to do [fracking] without first having a better sense of what the consequences are,” says Notley. She says that without a comprehensive review, which would ideally result in legislation specifically geared toward fracking, the provincial government does “not have the capacity to tell us if there’s a problem or not, because they’re not looking for it, first of all. Secondly, the nature of fracking has changed dramatically... we’re engaging in a much more risky form of fracking.”

Notley is particularly concerned with the possible effects horizontal fracking techniques could have on groundwater.

The NDP is not the only organization pressuring the Alberta government to initiate a study of fracking. The Council of Canadians is also campaigning for a review.

Notley says she is skeptical of the government’s claims that fracking is safe and closely monitored, especially after documents obtained by the Alberta Federation of Labour revealed in November 2011 that the government entered into discussions with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers to create a joint communications campaign to convince the public fracking is safe. That collaboration never materialized.

The quasi-independent Energy Resources Conservation Board, which reports directly to cabinet, is charged with regulating fracking activities in Alberta. It is currently reviewing its fracking rules, though the government has not expressed any intention to open a fully independent review.

Notley says she doesn’t believe the government understands the need for investigations apart from ERCB work.

“There’s a broad range of ways in which the government can act to protect the public and balance the need for sustainable and healthy economic development,” she says. “It’s a 40-year-old government that’s completely captured by the oil and gas industry, the end.”

 


Comments: 4

officematt2002 wrote:

Who draws their water from 600m+ below the ground where only brine water exists? Can somebody please provide the NDP with a crash course on geology? Their claims are tiresome and not based on science, per usual.

on Sep 2nd, 2012 at 8:46am Report Abuse

Drew Anderson wrote:

Nobody suggests that people get their drinking water from 600m+ below ground. The problems and the concerns stem from leaks above that level, specifically on the well casing. Industry acknowledges that there is some concern there and a recent study has shown that improper well construction caused methane contamination of ground water in Quebec.

The challenge in Alberta is that we've been fracking for so long that we have no baselines on which to measure natural occurrences versus what has been caused by fracking.

Politics? Oh yea. But science too.

on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 10:04am Report Abuse

Craggyone wrote:

Clarity required: are they frack-ing for tight gas or oil? With such a huge inventory of gas available, increasing gas production doesn't make much sense. Going for tight oil is different and so are the collateral damages. Are we on the cusp of a whole different scale of oil production and damages??

on Sep 4th, 2012 at 2:15pm Report Abuse

Drew Anderson wrote:

Both. And it's nothing all that new.

on Sep 4th, 2012 at 3:27pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2012

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use