Fort Chip doctor under fire

'My one and only concern is for the health of the community,' says O'Connor

The outspoken doctor who brought international attention to cancer rates downstream from the tarsands is under fire after a report critical of his conduct was leaked to news media.

The College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta recently dismissed several complaints against John O’Connor that were filed by Health Canada physicians in 2007, after O’Connor spoke out about higher-than-normal cancer rates in Fort Chipewyan, Alta. But the College found in its investigation that O’Connor obstructed government health agencies’ investigation efforts — a charge O’Connor denies.

“I don’t have any jurisdiction over allowing or not allowing access to any files, because I’m just a visiting physician,” says O’Connor, who now lives in Nova Scotia. The report, which also said O’Connor “persisted in exaggerating” cancer claims, was leaked to media earlier this month. “I don’t know what the motivation was in releasing the report,” says O’Connor. “My one and only concern is for the health of the community of Fort Chip.”

The College won’t comment on specific cases, but spokesperson Kelly Eby says that after an investigation, copies of the report are given to the complainer, the complainant and lawyers involved. “It is their choice as to what happens with that information.”

Health Canada didn’t respond to an interview request.

Liberal leader David Swann — a doctor who got fired from a medical job because of his outspokenness — says he “very much” respects O’Connor’s decision to publicly voice his concerns. “That is a very appropriate thing for a physician or any responsible community member to do…. We need more John O’Connors in our communities.”

O’Connor says he’s awaiting his lawyer’s advice on how to respond to the leaked report.


Comments: 3

Jeremy Klaszus wrote:

UPDATE: The National Post has posted a PDF of the full investigation on its website:

http://www.nationalpost.com/documents/091111-oconnor_misconduct.pdf

on Nov 12th, 2009 at 10:26am Report Abuse

identity_crisis wrote:

I still don't buy it. Something about the investigation seems flawed. Why is there such a big effort to assure patients in Fort Chip that their illness statistics are normal, when they themselves say differently? I think the physician is just relaying the message.

I read this at the Globe and Mail: the Alberta Cancer Board decided to separate leukemia from hematopoietics for the analysis. Once the figures were combined, blood cancers were double the expected rate (five expected, 10 diagnosed).

Also, Fort Chip is near a huge uranium source area.

on Nov 15th, 2009 at 10:07pm Report Abuse

w@tchdog wrote:

Readers should be aware that the Fort Chip Chipewyan First Nation and others have been lobbying the federal and provincial governments to investigate these issues for years. The documentary H2Oil gives a good synopsis of the kind of political games being played by all departments concerned. This is nothing new to First Nations people who must constantly contend with ignorant and uninformed views when it comes to getting their cases heard (for anyone doubting this, just look at the supreme court cases over the last 30 years). And for a more relevant example, take the case of the geese dying in the tarsands. First Nations have been fighting the issue of development and environmental impacts for years, but it took a special interest group, advocated by non-Natives, to get this issue any coverage.

The Fort Chip issue is tragic because it is primarily affecting most those who still practice a traditional diet, because all the carcinogens and chemicals being dumped into the ecosystem surrounding Fort Chip accumulate in the environment and end up intensifying because of what the residents are eating. Why doesn't science understand this? Instead scientists individualize the numbers, look at toxicity over a regional scale, and don't realize that no, they actually eat not just one animal per 1000 acres, its the entire diet that is being made toxic - from the water to the fish to the game to the herbs and medicines. Why aren't they gauging their studies on actual life experience, rather than playing a numbers game with the lives of people? TALK TO THE PEOPLE! Don't just appoint some would be "Indian Guide" to conduct their consultations, they have to go to the community and figure out what's going on, and work with the community to find solutions. 90% of the people they hire for these positions haven't grown up on reserves, are not part of any community, and have no understanding of the culture they're suppose to be dealing with. Without that kind of dedication, nothing will be done. And unless bureaucrats get off their duffs in Ottawa and admit they don't have a clue how to deal with the situation, and that a community based solution is what is needed, nothing is going to change. Instead we have a bargain basement mentality in our culture that says 'get in, take what you can get, and get out before you get caught,' so big business can continue to pollute as long as the government is getting its kickback, and the Indians and the environment will just have to continue to suffer.

on Nov 18th, 2009 at 5:20pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2011

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use