Lisa Kirkman and her daughter, Mia, hope their son and brother, Noah, will soon be returned to their Calgary home.
Calgary-born Noah Kirkman, 11, has been shuffled around four U.S. foster homes, renamed Beaner, and forbidden to practise his Jewish faith. And ever since he was “abducted” 18 months ago, Lisa Kirkman has been desperately fighting Oregon officials to get her son back home.
“They took my son. They have no right to take him,” the distraught mother says of the Oregon courts and foster-care system. “The Canadian government is going to have to get involved.”
The bizarre twist of events began in September 2008, when Oregon police picked up Noah for riding a bike without a helmet while visiting his stepfather, John Kirkman. Authorities discovered Noah has a history with social services in Canada because he has severe attention deficit disorder, and an Oregon family court gave the state’s Department of Human Services (DHS) custody of the boy, who in turn was placed in foster care. According to the mother, the court disregards Noah’s relationship with his American stepfather, who never legally adopted the boy but has regular supervised visits in Oregon with his stepson.
To get Noah back, Lisa was ordered by family court to undergo a slew of psychiatric evaluations, home studies, parenting classes and assessments — all of which she has since passed, prompting Calgary Child and Family Services to close her file. And now, DHS is demanding that the mother participate in private therapy sessions, which could cost as much as $20,000.
Meanwhile, a confused Noah wants to be with his family, not his current foster parents who have nicknamed him Beaner, a derogatory label given to Mexican descendents. Noah, who is of Jewish and Native descent, is restricted to supervised visits with his mother.
When Lisa turned to the Canadian government in Ottawa for help, she was told to continue working with a lawyer. “The only person who can advocate for your rights is your lawyer,” Foreign Affairs wrote to Lisa last September, suggesting that she review the federal government publication, “International Child Abductions, A Manual for Parents.” They also assured the mother that her son was in “a safe environment” in Oregon.
When Lisa reminded Foreign Affairs that because her son is a Canadian citizen, he is being held illegally, Ottawa suggested that she contact her member of parliament, Calgary Centre MP Lee Richardson, “as this would be a political decision which would fall outside the scope of our consular policy with regard to such cases.”
But when Lisa contacted Richardson’s office, she was told that “the Canadian government cannot get involved” until the Oregon court order is rescinded.
However, international law would supersede state law, says Lisa, who has hired an expert mediator in international child abduction to plead the case. Under The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, the kidnapping of minors in foreign countries — by a relative, stranger or government — requires governments to hand over children to their “habitual residence.” In Noah’s case this means Calgary, not Oregon, says the expert, Mary Damianakis.
“The courts do not decide who is the best parent or a better parent; the courts’ job is to decide the jurisdiction,” she says.
Desperate parents often seek help from bureaucrats, politicians and social workers who are ill-informed about this subject, says Damianakis. “I don’t think we have people in government who have the necessary tools to help the parents,” says Damianakis. “That’s the sad part of it.”
Perhaps complicating matters is Lisa’s criminal record for growing marijuana, which she says was medical marijuana for her husband, who has been diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis, an autoimmune disease. While living in Montreal and editing a pro-marijuana magazine, Lisa decided to move Noah back to Calgary so that he could attend a special-needs school. Noah was visiting his stepfather in Oregon while his mother got things in order for the family to move from Montreal to Calgary.
Lisa believes the Oregon judge who presides over all juvenile delinquency and dependency cases in Lane County, where Noah now lives, has made biased judgments about her competency as a mother.
“He has said flat out in court that he thinks I abandoned my son in the States to avail myself to their resources because I couldn’t get resources in Canada,” she says. “He also said ‘I don’t care if you successfully complete absolutely everything in the court order, it’s not a checklist. I’ll decide if Noah goes home.’ ”
Through his assistant, Judge Leonard told Fast Forward Weekly it would be “unethical” for him to comment on the case.
John, who is still married to Lisa, says the situation is bizarre. “Noah has no status here,” he said from Oregon. “He is considered an illegal alien under U.S. immigration laws.”
Lisa believes if her son had visited his stepdad in any other country, the family wouldn’t be living this nightmare. “There seems to be this prevailing attitude, ‘Well, if the U.S. does it, then it can’t be wrong. It can’t be illegal.”
She’s baffled as to why the court would apprehend only Noah — not his younger sister, Mia, an American citizen who is the daughter of Noah’s stepfather. She was staying with her father during the summer of 2008, when the incident started, and is now living in Calgary with her mother.
Lisa ultimately believes that court and foster-family officials think she neglected her son by dumping him with his stepfather. “They basically made it to sound like I sent my son down to the U.S. with no family there, that he was staying with a hobo,” she says. “If I can’t get my son back, they are going to adopt him out to strangers.”


Comments: 19
Iron James wrote:
on Jan 28th, 2010 at 10:22am Report Abuse
Lisa Kirkman wrote:
I hope they're right.
This should be a non-partisan issue. How dare the US step in and say, 'I'm sorry, Canada, but we don't think you can handle your own affairs. We'll do it for you,' the result of which being my Canadian child adopted out to strangers in America. It's disgusting.
on Jan 28th, 2010 at 12:36pm Report Abuse
Renee's Mommy wrote:
on Jan 28th, 2010 at 1:09pm Report Abuse
yesIah wrote:
on Jan 28th, 2010 at 9:42pm Report Abuse
yesIah wrote:
on Jan 29th, 2010 at 9:51am Report Abuse
Sowk wrote:
on Jan 29th, 2010 at 10:40am Report Abuse
Lisa Kirkman wrote:
Sowk: he's not white enough, we're not Christian enough and I'm not straight enough (in all senses of the word). My son is a Hungarian/Romanian/Spanish/Russian/Italian/Norweigian/English/Irish/First Nations Jewish Canadian. His grandparents were raised Jewish, Catholic, Southern Baptist and Muslim (and I was a Religious Studies major in Hinduism/Jainism). His Papa was born in Izmir, Turkey and raised in Virginia and his Mama was born in Edmonton and raised in Calgary.
I would think we have our bases covered. ;-p
on Jan 29th, 2010 at 11:40am Report Abuse
mary damianakis wrote:
Canada has an obligation to provide access to justice to the most vulnerable
in our society- our children.
The USA has been celebrating the release of Sean, this Christmas, many Americans and Canadians applauded the return of this child to his home – yet - many more children remain forgotten. Governments and agencies lack awareness and education on child abduction international laws and the emotional /financial impact on the children and their families.
The Hague Convention does not deter child abduction nor can it guarantee the return of a child.
Mary Damianakis
on Jan 29th, 2010 at 1:52pm Report Abuse
J_marshall wrote:
on Feb 1st, 2010 at 11:36am Report Abuse
tshowell wrote:
I think the best course of action would be to contact your MP or Lee Richardson to voice your displeasure or concerns rather than someone in the U.S.
Richardson's constituency office number is 403.244.1880. Calgary MPs Rob Anders (403-292-6666) and Deepak Obhrai (403-207-3030) have shown some interest in this case and may be worth contacting as well.
If you are interested in contacting a U.S. politician, Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoshi would likely be the one to talk to. Governor’s Citizens’ Representative Message Line: 503.378.4582
on Feb 1st, 2010 at 12:20pm Report Abuse
Lawrence A. Oshanek wrote:
Sue the United States in a Canadian Federal Court.
You want help ... contact me on Facebook.
Lawrence Oshanek
on Feb 5th, 2010 at 4:20pm Report Abuse
Lawrence A. Oshanek wrote:
on Feb 5th, 2010 at 9:17pm Report Abuse
cybermud wrote:
on Feb 16th, 2010 at 7:54am Report Abuse
tdhssp wrote:
Amendment to the Alberta FSCD (Family Support for Children with Disabilities) Act, became effective December 2006:
http://www.child.alberta.ca/home/527.cfm
Section 2-3, Manual Amendments: Policy and Procedures in Family Centred Supports and Services:
"The Family Support for Children with Disabilities Program to have separate legislation from that of child protection services."
In Celebration of the Importance of Life & Loving Memory of:
Samantha Lauren Martin, June 4, 1993 - December 3, 2006.
Therefore, the case of Noah Kirkman, seriously breaches the Amendment. He is a child with disability and his case viewed distinctly from that of a child intervention model.
on Feb 16th, 2010 at 11:43am Report Abuse
jlh9s wrote:
When the U.S. authorities ran a check on Noah, they found that Canada's own child welfare agencies already had a file on him. In other words, this wasn't Lisa Kirkman's first time being questioned by authorities - from her own country - regarding her care for her son.
Looks like Noah had wound up in foster care several times while in Canada. He also wound up being diagnosed with ODD and OCD while there.
U.S. authorities looked at placing Noah with his grandparents in Calgary, but when they tried to arrange an agency to do a home visit, Lisa Kirkman and her parents threatened the agency such that the visit was cancelled.
The mother has psychological problems that she is not getting treated. She claims that this is because of money - in spite of U.S. child agency authorities offering to pay for HALF of those treatment costs.
Ms. Kirkman's own psychologist from Calgary, Lisa Matsella, gave a less than glowing quote about her client, saying that she "tests well," but "has difficulties empathizing with others, and is very egocentric in choices that can result in hurt and instability for others in her life." Again, sounds like the mother wants her child back but isn't willing to engage in the kind of meaningful therapy or medical treatment to do so.
Noah has told his caseworker in the U.S. that he doesn't want to come home to her and would prefer to stay with his foster family. The same family at whose home he is now getting mostly A's in middle school. The mother denies this but ultimately doesn't seem to care, telling one reporter, "Even if he didn't want to come home, since when does an 11 year old get to decide which country he gets to live in?"
And in the end, the mother has a drug-related felony conviction. Regardless of one's views on medical marijuana, is advocating drugs really the kind of lifestyle one would want for a child? An already troubled child with a history of mental illness and instability?
If money ($10,000) is the only bar to treatment for the mother's psychological problems, why not start a donation site to try to get help rather than lambasting people who are trying to make sure the boy goes to a safe home?
http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/news/cityregion/24456525-57/kirkman-noah-dhs-court-canada.csp
on Feb 21st, 2010 at 9:15pm Report Abuse
aneegadole wrote:
on Feb 23rd, 2010 at 10:55am Report Abuse
Lisa Kirkman wrote:
- My son DOES NOT have an open protection file in Canada. When DHS contacted Canadian social services and asked whether he had a file, they didn't specify a protection file. My son has special needs and the agencies that handle services for children with special needs are the same agencies that handle child protection files (this is what Samantha's Law is about). Of course, my son has a LARGE social service file that's been open since he was a toddler, because social services are the gatekeeper for the services he needs.
- My son HAS been in and out of foster care a couple of times in BC--part-time THERAPEUTIC FOSTER CARE. There are services that are only offered to therapeutic foster parents, not the real parents (therapeutic horseback riding is one of them), so in order to access them, I agreed to a voluntary care agreement where I did NOT lose ANY of my parental rights. I had one protection incident where there was a misunderstanding, but this was cleared up in court in 2006. If I were a bad parent and my son was in foster care, why was he in my care when I took him down to OR in the first place?
- the psych eval done by Dr.Matsalla said I DO NOT HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT PERSONALITY OR MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS. The Register-Guard completely screwed up those details.
- what does my past conviction for growing a closet of medical cannabis for my sick husband--a conviction that will be wiped from my record (discharged) as of December 2010--something that isn't even ILLEGAL in Oregon--what does that have to do with whether a foreign government gets to abduct and keep my child? What crime could I possible commit--in ANY country--that would mean my children get exiled to another country?
- The DBT therapy is $20 000. It would be free if I were accepted into Calgary's DBT clinic, but I DO NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR DBT, namely a personality disorder like Borderline or a serious psychological/psychiatric issue. Private therapists will take ANYONE, regardless if there's any underlying problem. And aside from all this, I have NEVER refused DBT, or any of the other recommendations made by DHS.
I am by no means a perfect parent. Who is? But I can tell you that I've never done anything EVER to merit the US breaking international law by keeping my Canadian child in their country when he had gone down there for a visit. And what has my 7-yr-old daughter done to deserve losing her big brother? What has Noah done to deserve losing his citizenship and his entire family?
Even if you thought there were protection issues with me, why wouldn't he be sent back so Calgary Child Services could handle it? Why would I have custody (and never lost custody) of my daughter? I've been thoroughly investigated by Canadian social services and not only have they NOT found me a bad parent, they've CLOSED MY FILE IN CANADA. What does that tell you?
And even if you though I were dangerous to my son, why would he be put through FOUR foster homes, when he has an ENTIRE FAMILY here in Calgary that could take him. They, too, have been investigated by the private adoption agency DHS hired (contrary to the R-G article--they did not "threaten" anyone, nor was the home study cancelled) and the result of the investigations are that my family have been given a resounding thumbs up.
There is not a single reason why my son--ANY CANADIAN CHILD--would be better off in foster care in the US. We have better healthcare, education and social services. Calgary has over 1 000 000 people, Lane County as a whole has under 300 000 and Oregon is one of the poorest states in the US. And because they are so poor, I can see how the $14 000 they receive from the US Federal Government for adopting out my son would be attractive. It's selling children.
Do those missionaries who tried to take Haitian children to adopt them out in the US have a right to take those children, just because they would "have it better" in the US? Even if they already HAVE parents? Of course not!
And the Hague Convention is very clear: this has NOTHING to do with child welfare. i.e. if a child from Country A is taken into custody in Country B, they MUST be returned to Country A with no questions asked. It presupposes that Country A can handle it's own child welfare affairs (and there are no UCAPA laws in Oregon, as the DHS worker blatantly lied about). This isn't like he was arrested, either, as the immigration lawyer erroneously pointed out (and why are they asking an immigration lawyer? this is an international family law case--completely different type of law).
There IS no other side to this story. Why is it that both FFWD & the Calgary Sun received the same information (just to confirm what I'm saying is true, because DHS won't make statements) as the R-G, but didn't come up with the same drivel?
There is no justification, even if I were a hardened criminal in prison, for a foreign government to abduct and keep my Canadian child, who was just visiting the US. Period.
on Feb 26th, 2010 at 11:58am Report Abuse
letmejudge4myself wrote:
on Apr 20th, 2010 at 9:23pm Report Abuse
letmejudge4myself wrote:
on Apr 20th, 2010 at 9:24pm Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)