What's wrong with you, moorons (sic)?

You are so stuppid (sic), Fast Forward

A few years back I picked up your “publication” and I could not believed how come this kind of trash is allowed to waste precious paper to be wasted. Since it's free you poison young people before they learn what is right. Vulgar trashy language is your language, so where are you leading your reader. Seems as you address your mag. exclusively to stuppid people, is that your goal to create this stuppid society even more stuppid? It seem as Gwynne Dyer is a bid out of place in your trash (does he know who you are?) why you advertise whores & mixed up perverts? Why J. Klasus say screw you McNally-Robinson? Why on every page is f...

Your graphics are gory-bloody to scare, mix up your “reader” make them mentally unstable-sick, is that your mandate? your goal?

Luckilly your front cover clearly say to whom this trash is addressed, so decent people would not touch it.

I always thought that publication should teach something & that is positive something, lead young in the wright directions. And what are you doing? I am horrified to thing that perhaps you think you are doing a great service to society because you are so stuppid & can't tell wrong from wright? I think my assumption is correct, you are a bunch of sick idiots & you simply do not realise you are. Well, perish, disappear, quit you morons, you only poison this sick, mixed up nation.

Ron Romulus,

Calgary

P.S. Perhaps you should change the name of your mag: "From Moorons to Moorons Weekly" and state clearly on front cover: We promote-teach: stuppidity, vulgarity, crime, nothing-culture for morons.


Comments: 15

HeavyMetalHeathen wrote:

Brilliant.

on Jun 25th, 2009 at 9:18am Report Abuse

jjkubik wrote:

What's the point of running this letter? It's signed with an obviously fake name, it doesn't offer any real criticisms of anything in the paper and, simply, it's dumb. Sure, it's fun to laugh at people's stupidity, but FFWD has no way of knowing whether this is even a genuine letter and, more importantly, picking apart a straw man is a pretty lame way to feel superior. In either case, the joke's really on FFWD.

on Jun 25th, 2009 at 9:48am Report Abuse

martypants wrote:

At least he spelled moron correctly once.

on Jun 25th, 2009 at 3:17pm Report Abuse

girltron wrote:

Actually jjkubik, it made me laugh so hard I snorted and when I read it for the second time I laughed harder...and when I thought about the FFWD office receiving the letter, and reading it, I laughed harder than I did the first time. Thank you!

on Jun 25th, 2009 at 10:42pm Report Abuse

KennaBurima wrote:

Dear FFWD,
Please print more letters like the above. They make my day.
Thank you.
Kenna Burima

on Jun 26th, 2009 at 12:23pm Report Abuse

Marcello wrote:

Come on everyone. This is obviously a fake letter. Do you think that someone who cannot spell 'stupid' can spell 'assumption,' 'exclusively,' 'precious' and 'publication'? Or that someone this 'stuppid' can actually read, understand and like Gwynne Dyer?

M

on Jun 26th, 2009 at 2:01pm Report Abuse

Drew Anderson wrote:

If it is fake, someone put a lot of work into it. It was hand written and mailed to the office. It had clippings with crazy notes scrawled on them too. Either way, it made my Friday last week.

on Jun 26th, 2009 at 2:34pm Report Abuse

fang wrote:

I would love to see a photo of the original letter, clippings and all!

I too found this incredibly funny and figured that it _had_ to be satirical. Most people who can't spell don't consistently misspell words in my experience.

Either way it made me laugh.

on Jun 26th, 2009 at 4:50pm Report Abuse

B George wrote:

Fang,

You’re an imposter, a carefully contrived affectation of what you must imagine, at nights, while you lay awake imaging the next day’s series of tweets, an actual interesting, literate person is. You, and your ilk, like the club that apparently is FFWD, kill Calgary and anything remotely interesting in this barren city, your actions and words, like virus, infecting any and all of what might be interesting, and imaginative with your puny pretence, suffocating whatever is in your path. Frustrated academic, failed artist, feeble writer, which of those, I wonder are you? Offering an opinion – of an article or letter to the editor – is something different from offering, with an obvious sense of desperation, a defense of just how cool you think you are. I doubt you can even pronounce satirical, let alone define it, since you lazily misuse the word in your snappy retort.

on Jun 27th, 2009 at 1:20am Report Abuse

calgaryhumper wrote:

WOW B George, did you not get hired as a writer at FFWD or something? Could you be any more bitter?

on Jun 27th, 2009 at 2:11pm Report Abuse

B George wrote:

Bitter? Try realistic. Hired as a writer? Does not FFWD assign articles to those they've slept with, as an apology and reward of sorts?

on Jun 27th, 2009 at 3:42pm Report Abuse

fang wrote:

B George,

You too make me laugh!

I misuse a single word, (yes I'm admitting I misused it) and because of this you think I'm desperately defending how cool I am, and claim that me and my ilk "kill Calgary and anything remotely interesting in this barren city, your actions and words, like virus, infecting any and all of what might be interesting, and imaginative with your puny pretence, suffocating whatever is in your path!"

I bow to your mental powers - for it is obvious that no-one can compete with you.

on Jun 27th, 2009 at 4:53pm Report Abuse

fang wrote:

hahahahah!

Apparently, I'm quite slow! I totally missed the point of B George's response. Of course it was satirical while pointing out my misuse of the word in the first place.

Great stuff.

on Jun 28th, 2009 at 2:12pm Report Abuse

HeavyMetalHeathen wrote:

jjkubik, I'm no logician, but I fail to see a straw man fallacy in this matter. There is no retort -- only Mr. Romulus states a position. If I am mistaken, then please explain where I have erred.

on Jul 2nd, 2009 at 1:41pm Report Abuse

asiaticpygmie wrote:

"I always thought that publication should teach something & that is positive something, lead young in the wright directions." - How can we possibly take you seriously with such a terrible sentence? It is not only grammatically incorrect, but the content is even harder to comprehend. A paper should provide an objective, honest view; not a so-called "positive" take on everything so that we may "lead" the young. God forbid this "wright" path is the one you took, for then we just might be doomed. I suppose you want a society in which we deny the truth altogether, all to live a fake "positive" (brainwashed) existence. "Wright" you are not, Ron.

on Jul 12th, 2009 at 2:11pm Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2010

About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use