Don't buy into the Gore-Suzuki CO2 scam


I like your paper because you print what you want and to hell with what the mainstream thinks. Now that I've blown smoke up your ass, here's what's wrong with your publication.

You, like all the other mainstream media, have bought into the Gore-Suzuki scam of the century. Anyone with a brain, an asshole, a little bit of intelligence and a half-hour of time, that sits down in front of a computer and brings up the subject of global warming and doesn't read the propaganda side, but listens to intelligent men like Christopher Moncton, Timothy Ball, John Coleman (founder of the weather channel) and dozens of highly acclaimed scientists, will soon see through this CO2 scam.

If you still have doubts after watching these scientists totally destroy Gore’s BS, then ask yourself, why won't Gore and Suzuki or any of these gloom and doomers go on radio or TV in a head-to-head debate on global warming?

Jonathan Adler and Roy Green for over two years, have had a standing fee and open invitation to anyone on the warming side to debate, and no one will step up. But then why should they? Gore has gone from a net worth of $2 million after his election defeat to Bush, to over $200 million plus, since he started this scam. Suzuki has over 400 institutions under his name and control and lives in a beautiful house on the West Coast, while preaching we should all walk everywhere and live like monks.

Your paper promotes writers like Gwynne Dyer, who always seems to interject his views on global warming into his articles. If you’re going to print his views, why not print the views of Moncton or Ball? Maybe you would get a few people thinking for a change and head all the sheep in the direction of the truth.

If your paper had the balls, you would find out the truth and start printing it, on this CO2 scam. But, let me guess, if you did that, then a lot of your advertisers, who are tied into the banks, who are in turn tied into the cap and trade system, would cancel their ads with you.

And people with no lives and who need a religion, like the one Gore and Suzuki are promoting, would come down on your paper and you sure wouldn't want to lose those freeloaders.

Anyway, someday, some paper in this pussy-whipped country will have the guts to print the truth, take the heat and make a name for itself; it would sure be nice if it were a little guy like you.

STEVE BENNET

CALGARY


Comments: 3

CoreyPierce wrote:

Isn't Steve Bennet the name that Bart Simpson wanted to change his name to when he grew up?

It would make some sense is all I'm saying.

on Jan 8th, 2010 at 11:54am Report Abuse

CoreyPierce wrote:

"If your paper had the balls, you would find out the truth and start printing it, on this CO2 scam. But, let me guess, if you did that, then a lot of your advertisers, who are tied into the banks, who are in turn tied into the cap and trade system, would cancel their ads with you"

I mean seriously, its like:

Bart: So finally, we're all in agreement about what's going on with FFWD Weekly. Milhouse?
Milhouse: Ahem. OK, here's what we've got: the
Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people --
Bart: Thank you.
Milhouse: under the supervision of the reverse vampires --
Lisa: [sighs]
Milhouse: are forcing FFWD Weekly's editorial hand in a fiendish plot to eliminate the meal of dinner. We're
through the looking glass, here, people...

on Jan 8th, 2010 at 12:26pm Report Abuse

sillydebate wrote:

Comments like Mr. Bennet's feature an ardor for the oil industry and a disdain for evidence that borders on messianic. It is likely that the advocates for the non-global warming side for the debate would indulge in the wordplay and syllogistic shell games that would muddy the debate and leave consumers (emphasize that word) assured that they can have their way, which is more important than being right in this day an age.

If the global warming issue gets too unclear, challenge them to a discussion of peak oil and see what games these children come up with to discredit terms such as "supply," "demand" and "unrenewable resource."

on Jan 10th, 2010 at 8:19am Report Abuse


Post comment: (Login or Register)


All Content Copyright © Fast Forward Weekly 1995-2011

About Us Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Use