Tomorrow our children will be living in the city we are building today. It is they, and their children, who will reap the benefits or contend with the woes of our city-building practices. Buildings, roads and pipes are long-lived and, once set, prohibitively expensive to replace or retrofit. This longevity ties future Calgarians to the legacy we bequeath them, for good or ill.
We know cities of the future will be vastly different than they are today, yet we are not doing much to change business-as-usual. For example, we keep planning and building auto-dependent suburbs knowing well that they — and the lifestyles they make possible — could soon be outdated. Either they will be too expensive to maintain due to peak oil, or they will be outlawed for their excessive carbon emissions, or both. Whatever way it happens, the age of fossil fuels is drawing to a close and we will need a long goodbye to prepare for its replacement. That is why it is important to begin the transformation now and to get it right.
In preceding articles, some of the benefits of returning trams to the streets of Calgary have been described. Tramlines function as major arteries for vibrant urban villages. The economic benefits include miles of enhanced opportunity for businesses along new streetcar corridors where rail infrastructure provides incentive for entrepreneurs to invest. Junctions where tramlines cross or intersect with the LRT are particularly intense nodes of commercial social activity and are attractive to business. Moreover, from a cost perspective, trams deliver more value than any other transit option after lifetime costs are accounted for.
Environmentally, over the long term, trams have been shown to be the most energy efficient means of public or private transportation. As they are electric-powered, trams can tap into the same zero emissions, renewable energy sources now driving Calgary’s LRT.
As part of a complete transit network, trams play a role that neither buses nor LRT can duplicate as they span a variety of transit niches at local and city-wide scales. Trams connect existing transit nodes, and in so doing offer extra measures of flexibility and choice to users. They provide a much more pleasant ride than a bus. They are unparalleled catalysts for economic development because they link communities and foster opportunity along the line.
Despite these advantages, neither of Calgary’s two main planning documents — the Municipal Development Plan or the Calgary Transportation Plan — ever mentions trams or streetcars. To help move trams back into the spotlight we present our nominations for the first six Calgary streets of Calgary’s modern tram network:
1. 37th Street S.W.-Westbrook LRT-Mount Royal University: A no-brainer, 37th Street is ripe for intensification and would make a beautiful tram street, not to mention the city desperately needs to get the new university into a high-quality transit loop.
2. International Avenue-Inglewood-East Village-Stampede-Westbrook (17th Avenue and 52nd Street S.E. to 37th Street S.W.): In addition to providing thousands of working class households with dependable access to the core, this line, if routed creatively, would link Inglewood to the city’s new baby — East Village, which has no fixed transit link planned — to the Stampede LRT and the Beltline tram. As future plans envision the Stampede grounds open to normal traffic, the tram line could be routed along Ninth Avenue from Inglewood, across the Elbow River, flank the south edge of East Village then turn south down the new Fourth Street S.E. corridor and, finally, turn west on 17th Avenue in front of a hypothetical new hockey arena.
3. Centre Street/Edmonton Trail loop (Downtown to McKnight Boulevard): Both were previously tram streets. Both have tremendous potential for commercial and residential intensification and for connecting transit to working-class neighbourhoods.
4. Mission loop (Prince’s Island to Elbow Drive; Fourth Street; Fifth Street)
5. Beltline-Sunalta-Victoria Park loop (Sunalta to Stampede; 11th Avenue and 12th Avenue): Together with the Mission loop, this reconnects the entire southern flank of downtown with fixed transit. This route provides important connections to the LRT at the downtown, Stampede and Sunalta stations.
6. The 10th Street N.W./Northmount Drive line has fabulous potential as a tram street because of the large number of schools, libraries, community centres, sport facilities and shopping along the corridor. This route puts fixed-rail transit within a five-to-seven-minute walking distance of a major shopping mall, the Kensington commercial district and the homes of many thousands of Calgarians in Rosemount, Triwood, Brentwood and Dalhousie.
While a highly effective transit network itself does make a resilient city, no city can be resilient or sustainable without one.
Next article: The devil is in the details: Five suggestions to help us love public transit.
Geoff Ghitter teaches urban studies at the University of Calgary. Links to the research used in this article and to maps of proposed tramlines can be found on his blog at geeessgee.blogspot.com. Noel Keough is an assistant professor in the faculty of environmental design at the University of Calgary and is co-founder of Sustainable Calgary Society.


Comments: 5
Clairvoyant wrote:
"Tramlines function as major arteries for vibrant urban villages." It seems beyond the comprehension of the central planners that many (most?) of us have chosen (and continue to choose) to live in quiet, dull, boring, safe, spacious, pleasant communities. To the central planners, the only choice is the central planners' choice, the new utopia, the vibrant urban village: everyone must be forced to live in the central planners' choice. "... it is important to begin the transformation now and to get it right." Forcing people into styles of communities that they do not want is getting it "right"?
"prohibitively expensive to replace or retrofit" Well that is good news ... it means that it is prohibitively expensive to put tram lines into existing communities. So those of us who don't want our quiet communities destroyed don't have to worry? Duh! We have been able to afford to build: so why will future generations not be able to build or rebuild or replace or retrofit?
"That is why it is important to begin the transformation now and to get it right." He who uses crystal ball, eats glass. The arrogance of the central planners is stunning, especially in the context of multiple decades of failure. The basic tenets of Jane Jacobs, the failures of the central planners, the misapplication of central urban solutions to suburbs and smaller cities, and the ability of individuals (rather than governments) to adapt & to adapt their surroundings continue to be rejected and ignored by central planners even as they worship at her feet. Witness "cataclysmic money" and the central planner led destruction of Brentwood.
" ... zero emissions ... driving Calgary's LRT." Although Calgary Transit and Enmax are both owned by the citizens of Calgary, costs of the "zero emission" power are not available to the public: might there be some fear that the accounting of Enron of the North would not be approved by the citizens? So let's keep the finances hidden, the citizens in the dark. And the costs ($ and environmental) of backup power are paid by who?
"... auto-dependent suburbs ... or they will be outlawed ..." Yep, that's central planners. Individuals cannot be allowed to make their own adaptations: individuals cannot be allowed to make their own choices. So much for freedom.
on Dec 17th, 2010 at 8:21pm Report Abuse
Thismustbetheplace wrote:
It spans far beyond the static. The reliable. The safe. This city, in it's quiet protest, voices itself in pubs, in boardrooms, in bedrooms, and in a lot of ways, this article. People here love their urban tranquility, myself included. But people like myself also crave what this city hasn't been able to offer properly to anyone outside of a tiny cross-section of the overall expanse.
Urban centre access is a need, not a want. Some just don't know it yet.
"Clairvoyent's" near-assertion that city planners are parallel to Orwellian policy makers is comical, if not sad in it's naivety. Sure, trust is hard to dole out this day and age, but really? You feel central planners' goal is to quell the 'individual's decison-making uprising'? Let's have real discussions on the topic, not knee-jerk, reactionary repartee.
To sum: good article shedding light on an item of public concern that is more food for thought than '1984'
_-_-_
on Dec 20th, 2010 at 8:19pm Report Abuse
mtp wrote:
on Dec 21st, 2010 at 10:53am Report Abuse
Clairvoyant wrote:
I would love to understand the LRT and windpower, most specifically the price history comparing what Calgary Transit has paid versus the lowest cost power available from the grid: what data can you provide?
On the concept of streetcars, what evaluations have been done by Calgary Transit? And are those available to the public?
To thismustbetheplace, sorry, but another quote. "People here love their urban tranquility, myself included." What gives central planners, be they civil servants or academics, the "power" to come in and destroy the tranquility of our community, without allowing us to vote yea or nay to the proposed changes? Perhaps I am in error, but I do not believe that professor Keough or Councilor Farrell or anyone in the city administration will ever make the argument that redevelopment should only occur with the approval of the affected residents: see Brentwood: see Brentwood Concerned Citizens. Would you support no redevelopment without approval of the residents? That the development permit for "University City" should be refused? "Let's have real discussions" ... how about the Northland Mall Tim Hortons, 10 am Wednesday December 29 ... I will be wearing a blue jacket ... and mtp could come too!
on Dec 22nd, 2010 at 7:17pm Report Abuse
Eoure wrote:
•It is prohibitively expensive to put tram lines into existing communities.
•The misapplication of central urban solutions to suburbs and smaller cities.
•“Central planners” hate democracy.
•Everyone must be forced to live in the “central planners’” choice.
•The “central planners’” multiple decades of failure.
•Individuals can not be allowed to make their own choices by “central planners.”
•“Central planners” even exist.
Clairvoyant’s misconceptions sabotage whatever she or he says.
on Mar 18th, 2011 at 9pm Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)